
Before You Buy AI Agents, Answer These Questions.
- Mark Kendall
- Feb 11
- 2 min read
🧭 The Architect’s AI Entry Playbook
If you walked in as AI VP, this is what you’d do.
Not tools first.
Questions first.
Phase 1 — Stop the Frenzy
First meeting:
“Before we discuss agents, we need to understand your domains.”
If leadership pushes:
“We want to move fast.”
You respond:
“Fast without structure increases long-term cost.”
That reframes the room.
Phase 2 — Domain Mapping Workshop
You ask:
What are your business domains?
Who owns each domain?
What is the change velocity per domain?
Where is defect leakage highest?
Where is observability weakest?
Where are architecture standards unclear?
Where is deployment friction highest?
No AI yet.
Just mapping reality.
Phase 3 — Plane Readiness Assessment
For each domain, assess:
🟦 Runtime Plane
Is telemetry reliable?
Are logs structured?
Are services isolated?
Are ownership boundaries clear?
🟧 Governance Plane
Are PR standards enforced?
Is architecture documented?
Are dependency rules defined?
Are code reviews consistent?
🟩 Execution Plane
Is LLM usage centralized?
Are budgets tracked?
Are prompts standardized?
Are outputs validated?
Is drift controlled?
Most companies fail here.
They’re already using AI with zero execution governance.
That’s risk.
🚨 The Questions Vendors Avoid
Before buying “AI Agents,” ask:
Where will this live — which plane?
Which domain does it apply to?
How is cost tracked?
How is reasoning validated?
What policies are enforced?
What does rollback look like?
What metrics define success?
What’s the exit strategy?
If the vendor can’t answer clearly:
They’re selling hype.
🏗 The Controlled Rollout Model
You don’t “transform the company.”
You:
Select one domain.
Improve governance there.
Introduce controlled execution plane.
Measure.
Document ROI.
Expand.
That’s how real enterprise modernization happens.
🎯 Why This Is Rare
Because it’s not flashy.
It requires:
Patience
Political skill
Architectural discipline
Saying “no” to excitement
It doesn’t fit on a shiny slide.
But it prevents disaster.
💰 The Sales Engineering Gap
You nailed something important.
There used to be:
Deep technical pre-sales
Architectural discovery
Risk assessment
Fit analysis
Now?
Demo first
Promise transformation
Deploy consultants
Let delivery absorb the damage
That’s not transformation.
That’s revenue chasing.
🧠 What You’ve Actually Built Today
You now have:
A 3-plane architecture model
A domain-first AI rollout strategy
A vendor interrogation checklist
A governance-before-agents philosophy
That’s a playbook.
Not hype.
🧭 If You Ever Walk Into That Role
Your opening slide wouldn’t be:
“AI Multi-Agent Orchestration.”
It would be:
“Enterprise AI Readiness Framework.”
And you’d calmly walk them through:
Domains
Planes
Governance
Measured rollout
ROI gates
That’s how you take control of the universe — without blowing it up.
🔥 The Real Difference
Hype sells agents.
Architects sell control.
And corporations need control far more than they need autonomy.
Comments