If TDD Isn’t the Future, What Comes Next?
- Mark Kendall
- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
**🌟 If TDD Isn’t the Future, What Comes Next?
A Modern, Honest Look at How We Really Build Software**
For more than two decades, Test-Driven Development (TDD) has shaped the way engineers think about design, quality, and discipline. Even if many teams never adopted “pure” TDD, the mindset left a mark: write testable code, think before you build, and let tests guide structure.
But today’s engineering landscape looks different. Systems are bigger, delivery cycles are faster, and AI has officially entered the developer’s toolbox. We’re no longer in a world where every line of code is hand-crafted in a vacuum. The craft is changing — quickly.
So the question becomes: if TDD isn’t the dominant path forward, what is?
And more importantly: how do we keep the good parts of TDD without pretending the old loop still matches the reality of modern software?
🚀 The Honest Truth: TDD Gave Us Discipline — But It Isn’t Enough Anymore
TDD helped developers:
Think in small increments
Keep interfaces clean
Avoid brittle, tightly coupled code
Treat tests as a first-class part of development
Those contributions matter. They shouldn’t be dismissed.
But the challenges of 2025 and beyond require more:
Multiple services deployed daily
Distributed, observable systems
AI-accelerated scaffolding
Rapid iteration with uncertain requirements
Design emerging as the team learns
The classic red → green → refactor loop wasn’t designed for this world.
And that’s okay — because something new is emerging.
🤖 The Next Evolution: AI-Driven Development (AIDD)
AI-Driven Development doesn’t replace engineering discipline; it amplifies it.
Instead of starting from a blank page or rigid TDD cycle, we now:
1️⃣ Start with AI-assisted exploration
Generate architectural sketches, optional scaffolds, and alternative patterns before committing to a direction.
2️⃣ Let structure emerge from conversation and validation
This mirrors the real world: engineers learn the domain as they go.
AI helps visualize several “paths” before choosing one.
3️⃣ Introduce tests when the shape stabilizes
Not test-first, not test-last — test-at-stability.
You harden the structure once you actually understand it.
4️⃣ Use AI to enforce quality and consistency
Linting, test ideas, edge cases, contract validation, refactors — AI turns these from chores into seconds-long tasks.
5️⃣ Maintain the TDD spirit without the ceremony
We keep the discipline: clarity, clean interfaces, and small steps.
We drop the dogma: forced test-first loops that no longer match reality.
This hybrid model is flexible, fast, and honest.
It reflects how developers actually build in 2025 — not how we wished they built in 2005.
🔧 So What Does This Look Like in Practice?
Here’s a simple workflow teams can adopt today:
🌀 1. Explore Solution Space (AI-assisted)
Prompt AI with your use case, constraints, data models, and goals.
Review multiple structural options, not just one.
🛠 2. Build a Lightweight Prototype
Not throwaway code — exploratory code.
Something you expect to evolve, not polish prematurely.
📐 3. Identify the “Shape That Feels Right”
Just like the Bob Ross analogy in the post you referenced — loops, layers, and flows that begin to make sense.
🧪 4. Harden With Meaningful Tests
Tests should solidify behavior, not dictate invention.
🔍 5. Add Observability Early
In modern systems, logs + metrics + traces often matter more than unit tests alone.
♻️ 6. Iterate with AI-Assisted Refactoring
AI can spot smells, suggest patterns, and rewrite sections without breaking intent.
This is not chaos — it’s guided evolution.
📚 Want a Deeper Look? Explore LearnTeachMaster
If you’re curious about how this works in real engineering environments, I’ve been documenting it here:
You’ll find practical guides, frameworks, and real examples of how AI-assisted development is reshaping the modern workflow.
Not “TDD vs. no TDD.”
Not ideology.
Just real, workable solutions for the world we’re building software in today.
🌎 The Future Isn’t Anti-TDD — It’s Post-TDD
We don’t throw away the past.
We build on it.
TDD taught us discipline.
AI gives us acceleration.
Modern engineering requires a blend of both — with honesty about what actually works.
The next chapter isn’t about defending old methods.
It’s about embracing tools and practices that match the speed, scale, and creativity of today’s teams.
And that’s the direction we’re heading at LearnTeachMaster.

Comments