top of page
Search

The Architect in the Age of AI Week 1

  • Writer: Mark Kendall
    Mark Kendall
  • Jan 5
  • 3 min read



The Architect in the Age of AI Week 1




Skills, Standards, and What “Good” Actually Looks Like Going Forward



As we start a new year, it’s worth asking a simple but uncomfortable question:


What does it actually mean to be a good architect anymore?


Not in theory.

Not in slide decks.

But in the real world—inside complex systems, delivery pressure, incomplete information, and increasingly, AI-driven automation.


This article kicks off a weekly series on LearnTeachMaster.org focused on exactly that question.


Not as an academic exercise.

But as notes from the field—what works, what fails, and what an architect must now be accountable for if they want a career that lasts.





LearnTeachMaster.org: A Foundation Built From the Field



LearnTeachMaster.org has never been about certifications or buzzwords.


It’s a working notebook:


  • hands-on technical exploration

  • real systems, real constraints

  • lessons learned the hard way

  • architecture as something you practice, not just talk about



If you’re early in your architectural journey, it gives you grounding.

If you’re experienced, it gives you reflection.


And in the age of AI, that grounding matters more than ever.





The Role of the Architect Has Changed (Quietly, But Completely)



The traditional architect role was centered on:


  • designing systems up front

  • drawing boundaries

  • creating diagrams and standards

  • reviewing designs before implementation



That model assumed:


  • relatively stable systems

  • slow evolution

  • human-only decision making



None of those assumptions hold anymore.


Today’s systems:


  • evolve continuously

  • span dozens of repos and teams

  • include automation and AI

  • change faster than documentation can keep up



As a result, architecture can no longer be static.





The New Core Responsibility: Direction, Not Design



Modern architectural excellence is not about controlling every change.


It’s about ensuring direction remains intentional.


The architect in the AI era is responsible for:


  • declaring architectural intent clearly

  • ensuring systems evolve within that intent

  • detecting meaningful drift early

  • preserving why decisions were made—not just what was built



This is a fundamentally different job.





Core Skills of an Architect in the AI Era



Over the coming weeks, this series will explore these in depth. For now, here is the baseline skill set every modern architect must develop.



1. Intent Articulation



The ability to clearly express:


  • what the system is trying to become

  • what tradeoffs are acceptable

  • what is explicitly not allowed



If intent is vague, drift is guaranteed.





2. Signal Literacy



Architects must learn to read signals from:


  • pipelines

  • diffs

  • runtime behavior

  • system evolution patterns



Not every signal matters.

Knowing which ones do is the skill.





3. Drift Awareness



Drift is inevitable.


What matters is:


  • recognizing it

  • understanding it

  • deciding whether it’s intentional or accidental



Ignoring drift is how architectures decay silently.





4. Systems Thinking (Beyond Code)



Modern architects think across:


  • teams

  • tooling

  • incentives

  • organizational behavior



Architecture fails more often due to human systems than technical ones.





5. AI Governance Mindset



As AI becomes embedded:


  • automation must be constrained

  • decisions must be explainable

  • evolution must be verifiable



Architects are no longer just designing systems—they are governing behavior.





Acceptance Criteria: How Do You Know You’re Doing a Good Job?



This is the question most architects never get a clear answer to.


Here are some practical acceptance criteria for modern architectural excellence:


  • The system evolves without constant surprise

  • Teams understand why constraints exist

  • Architectural deviations are visible and explainable

  • Decisions are traceable months or years later

  • AI and automation cannot move the system unintentionally

  • Customer outcomes improve without architectural chaos



If these are true, you’re doing your job—whether anyone notices day to day or not.





Architecture as a Long-Term Career (Not a Burnout Role)



Many architects burn out because they are trapped between:


  • delivery pressure

  • organizational ambiguity

  • lack of authority

  • lack of clarity



A sustainable architectural career requires:


  • a personal operating model

  • a clear definition of excellence

  • tools and practices that scale you, not just the system



This series is about building exactly that.





What This Weekly Series Will Cover



Over the coming weeks, we’ll explore topics like:


  • Architecture and intent in AI-driven systems

  • Drift detection vs governance theater

  • Architect-owned pipelines and signals

  • AI as a reviewer, not a decider

  • Preserving architectural memory over years

  • How to stay relevant as systems accelerate



Each article will be practical, grounded, and field-tested.





Final Thought



The architect’s role has not disappeared.


It has become more subtle, more critical, and more demanding.


Those who adapt—who learn to govern direction rather than control design—will have careers that thrive for decades.


Those who don’t will be left drawing maps for systems that no longer follow them.


This year, this series is about choosing the first path.


Welcome to the new year.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2020 by LearnTeachMaster DevOps. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page