top of page
Search

The Saga Pattern and Kafka

  • Writer: Mark Kendall
    Mark Kendall
  • 1 day ago
  • 3 min read

Okay, let's aim for an article that consolidates the Saga pattern concepts and then brainstorm some POC ideas using Spring Boot microservices.

The Saga Pattern for Distributed Transactions in Microservices

In a microservices architecture, where services are independent and often have their own databases, managing transactions that span multiple services becomes a significant challenge. Traditional distributed transactions (like two-phase commit) can lead to performance bottlenecks and tight coupling. The Saga pattern offers an alternative approach to manage these long-lived, distributed transactions by breaking them down into a sequence of local transactions.

Core Concepts:

  1. Local Transactions: A Saga is composed of a series of local transactions. Each participating service executes its own local transaction.

  2. Event-Driven: After each local transaction, the service publishes an event that triggers the next step in the Saga, often in another service.

  3. Compensating Transactions: If a local transaction fails, the Saga executes a series of compensating transactions to undo the effects of the preceding successful transactions, ensuring eventual consistency.

Types of Saga Implementation:

  1. Choreography:

    • Services react to events published by other services.

    • No central orchestrator.

    • Pros: Loose coupling.

    • Cons: Can become complex with many participants, harder to track the overall process.

  2. Orchestration:

    • A central orchestrator service manages the Saga flow.

    • The orchestrator tells participants which local transaction to execute based on events.

    • Pros: Easier to manage complex workflows, centralized control.

    • Cons: Introduces a dependency on the orchestrator.

Challenges with the Saga Pattern:

  • Eventual Consistency: Data across services is only consistent eventually, which might not be suitable for all scenarios.

  • Complexity of Compensating Transactions: Designing and implementing reliable compensating transactions can be challenging.

  • Idempotency: Handlers for Saga events must be idempotent to handle potential duplicate events.

Proof of Concept Ideas with Saga Pattern and Spring Boot Microservices

Here are a few ideas for a Proof of Concept (POC) to demonstrate the Saga pattern using Spring Boot microservices:

1. Basic Order Placement:

  • Services:

    • Order Service: Handles order creation and management.

    • Inventory Service: Manages product stock.

    • Payment Service: Processes payments.

  • Saga Flow (Orchestration or Choreography):

    1. Order Service creates a pending order.

    2. Inventory Service attempts to reserve the requested items.

    3. Payment Service attempts to process the payment.

    4. Based on the outcomes, the Order Service either confirms the order or initiates compensating transactions (e.g., canceling the reservation in Inventory Service, refunding in Payment Service).

  • Technology: Spring Boot, Spring Cloud Stream (for event handling with Kafka or RabbitMQ), in-memory or simple databases for each service.

2. Ticket Booking System:

  • Services:

    • Booking Service: Manages bookings.

    • Seat Reservation Service: Handles seat availability.

    • Payment Service: Processes payments.

  • Saga Flow (Orchestration):

    1. Booking Orchestrator initiates the booking.

    2. Seat Reservation Service attempts to reserve seats.

    3. Payment Service processes payment.

    4. If any step fails, the orchestrator triggers compensating actions (e.g., releasing reserved seats, refunding payment).

  • Technology: Spring Boot, Spring WebFlux (for reactive communication), a centralized orchestrator service, and separate data stores.

3. Travel Booking (Flight + Hotel):

  • Services:

    • Trip Service (Orchestrator).

    • Flight Booking Service.

    • Hotel Booking Service.

  • Saga Flow (Orchestration):

    1. Trip Service receives a travel request.

    2. It instructs Flight Booking Service to book a flight.

    3. Upon success, it instructs Hotel Booking Service to book a hotel.

    4. If hotel booking fails, Trip Service tells Flight Booking Service to cancel the flight booking.

  • Technology: Spring Boot, Spring Cloud OpenFeign (for declarative HTTP clients), a dedicated orchestrator, and individual service databases.

Key aspects to demonstrate in any POC:

  • Local transactions within each service.

  • Communication between services using events (if choreography) or commands/events (if orchestration).

  • Implementation of compensating transactions to handle failures.

  • Observability of the Saga flow.

Which of these POC ideas sounds most interesting to you, or do you have another scenario in mind? We can then discuss the implementation details further.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Using OpenRewrite- Why not?

Okay, let's clarify what you can expect to happen in IntelliJ IDEA when you trigger a Maven build that includes the OpenRewrite plugin...

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2020 by LearnTeachMaster DevOps. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page